Avoiding Conflict of Interest
It is expected of judges to decide cases solely on the basis of the law’s merits and the evidence presented to them. There is a possibility that retired judges will appear before their former colleagues or even have their own decisions challenged in court if they are allowed to practice law. Such situations might bring about irreconcilable circumstances, as private connections and expert affiliations created during their residency on the seat could cloud their judgment or subvert public trust in the legal executive.
Why Judges of the Supreme Court are Prohibited to Practice After Retirement?
Judges of the Supreme Court are Prohibited to Practice After Retirement: The judiciary is tasked with upholding the rule of law and ensuring justice for all, making it an essential component of democracy. It is essential for judges to maintain their independence throughout their tenure in order to maintain impartiality and the public’s trust. The practice of preventing retired Supreme Court judges from practicing law has been established in many nations, including several with common law traditions like India and the United States. The significance of this restriction in maintaining the judiciary’s integrity is examined in this article.
Following are the reasons why the judges of the Supreme Court are prohibited to practice after retirement