Preserving Judicial Integrity
Prohibiting post-retirement practice acts as a safeguard for the judiciary’s credibility. Retired judges are well-known personalities with considerable clout in the legal community. Allowing them to practice law immediately after retiring from the Supreme Court may result in a power imbalance, perhaps leading to favoritism or the perception of preferential treatment for their clients. Keeping the court and the legal profession apart helps to ensure the impartiality and integrity of the overall judicial system.
Why Judges of the Supreme Court are Prohibited to Practice After Retirement?
Judges of the Supreme Court are Prohibited to Practice After Retirement: The judiciary is tasked with upholding the rule of law and ensuring justice for all, making it an essential component of democracy. It is essential for judges to maintain their independence throughout their tenure in order to maintain impartiality and the public’s trust. The practice of preventing retired Supreme Court judges from practicing law has been established in many nations, including several with common law traditions like India and the United States. The significance of this restriction in maintaining the judiciary’s integrity is examined in this article.
Following are the reasons why the judges of the Supreme Court are prohibited to practice after retirement