‘Co’ for ‘Could-have initiatives’
Nice-to-have initiatives are another term for “could-have” initiatives. “Could-have” initiatives are not required for the product’s core function. However, when compared to “should-have” initiatives, they have a much smaller impact on the outcome if they are not implemented.
As a result, initiatives in the “could-have” category are frequently the first to be deprioritized if a project in the “should-have” or “must-have” category proves to be larger than anticipated.
MoSCoW Prioritization Technique in Product Management
MoSCoW Prioritization Technique, also known as the MoSCoW method or MoSCoW analysis, is a prioritization technique used by product managers to build a hierarchy of priorities while prioritizing feature requests or backlogs. In this article, we will learn what is MOSCOW Prioritization, how does it works, its history, real-life examples, advantages, disadvantages, examples and many things related to it.
Table of Content
- What is MoSCoW Prioritization Technique?
- How Does MoSCoW Prioritization Technique Work?
- MoSCoW Prioritization Technique Categories
- 1. ‘Mo’ for ‘Must-have initiatives’
- 2. ‘S’ for ‘Should-have initiatives’
- 3. ‘Co’ for ‘Could-have initiatives’
- 4. ‘W’ for ‘Will not have (this time)’
- Why is Prioritization necessary in Product Management?
- History of MoSCoW Prioritization Method
- How can Development Teams make the most use of MoSCoW Prioritization Technique?
- When Do We Use this MoSCoW Prioritisation Method?
- MoSCoW Prioritization Technique Rules
- MoSCoW Prioritization Technique Real Time Example
- Advantages of MoSCoW Prioritization Method
- Disadvantages of MoSCoW Prioritization Method
- For which contexts or situations does one use MoSCow Method for Prioritization?
- Best Practices for Using MoSCoW Prioritization Technique
- Conclusion: MoSCoW Prioritization Technique
- FAQs on MoSCoW Prioritization Technique