AWS Fargate Disadvantages
- Not recommended for simple tasks: For simple tasks, AWS Fargate might be a costly option as compared to Amazon ECS or EKS.
- Less control for users: For users who have requirements to customize each and every detail, Fargate is not a good option, as it does not give users a lot of control.
- Availability: Less available regions as compared to Amazon ECS or EKS.
Introduction to AWS FargateAmazon ECS vs AWS Fargate
AWS Fargate is a feature in container services in Amazon Web Services that can be used to run your containers without having to manage the server or the underlying architecture. It is a serverless computing engine for containers. It is a pay-as-you-go model, i.e. pay for the resources you are using. Furthermore, it can be used with container services in AWS like ECS (Amazon Elastic Container Service) and EKS (Amazon Elastic Kubernetes Service). It is one of the most important features of serverless computing in AWS. Whenever you opt for Fargate, the infrastructure will be owned and managed by AWS(Amazon Web Services). It saves you time by automating features like patching, updating, and dealing with resources. The operating systems supported by Fargate are Amazon Linux 2, Windows Server 2019 Full, and Windows Server 2019 Core.