Difference Between Amazon ECS And AWS Fargate
Feature | Amazon ECS | AWS Fargate |
---|---|---|
Scaling | Requires manual scaling based on EC2 instance capacity | Auto-scaling based on container requirements is more dynamic |
Encryption | Various server-side encryption options (SSE-S3, SSE-KMS, and SSE-C) | Similar server-side encryption options for data at rest |
Use Cases | Granular control, specific EC2 needs, existing investments | Serverless approach, no EC2 management, dynamic workloads |
Ease of Use | Involves manual infrastructure management | Simplified container management, no infrastructure management |
Cost Model | Additional costs for EC2 instance running and management | Granular billing per vCPU and memory per second for Fargate |
Difference Between AWS (Amazon Web Services) ECS And AWS Fargate
While both AWS ECS and Fargate play in the container orchestration field, their approaches diverge like two paths on a mountain trail. ECS empowers you with direct control over the underlying infrastructure, like an experienced builder crafting a custom container home. You choose and manage the bricks and mortar (EC2 instances) for a personalized container environment. On the other hand, Fargate takes the “ready-to-move-in” route, handling the infrastructure behind the scenes like a well-equipped concierge. You simply focus on your containers, leaving the server management to Fargate. The choice comes down to whether you seek control of a hands-on builder or the ease of a pre-built haven for your containerized applications.