Difference Between Apache Kafka and Apache Pulsar
Apache Kafka |
Apache Pulsar |
---|---|
It works on the publish-subscribe messaging system. |
It works on both the publish-subscribe and queueing messaging systems. |
Apache Kafka supports log-structured storage with retention policies. |
Apache Pulsar also supports log-structured storage with retention policies. |
Apache Kakfa offers very limited multi-tenancy support. |
Apache Pulsar offers native multi-tenancy support. |
Apache Kafka is configurable, but not as configurable as Apache Pulsar. |
Apache pulsar offers highly configurable message TTL settings. |
Apache Kafka partitions the messages into topics. |
Apache pulsar partitions topics into namespaces, which can contain topics. |
Apache Kafka can be complex, and it typically requires manual configuration. |
Apache pulsar is good as it supports native support for automatic horizontal scaling. |
Apache Kafka works on Apache Kafka Protocol. |
Apache Pulsar works on Pulsar Protocol, and Kafka Protocol (compatibility layer). |
It has built in support for schema registery. |
It has a built-in schema registry to support for schema evolution. |
It has good client library support for various programming languages. |
Apache Pulsar also has similar rich client library support. |
Apache Kafka vs Apache Pulsar: Top Differences
Many people have heard about Apache Kafka as well as Apache Pulsar, they both seem like they are the same but once we try to understand the core concepts of both of these software and take a look at their features then we understand that there are many differences between this two software so let’s take a look at the difference between Apache Kafka and Apache Pulsar to understand this.