Difference between Fast Tracking and Crashing
Parameters |
Fast Tracking |
Crashing |
---|---|---|
Nature |
Fast tracking means carrying out essential path tasks concurrently, which reduces the project timetable. |
Crashing is the process of giving critical path tasks more resources to reduce their duration. |
Goal |
It is primarily used to fulfill deadlines and complete projects more quickly. |
It is primarily used to expedite project completion without altering the project’s scope or order of operations. |
Focus |
It places a focus on cutting down on project time through the overlap of consecutive tasks. |
By allocating more resources to expedite vital tasks, it seeks to shorten the project’s duration. |
Example |
Fast tracking in construction refers to the practice of beginning interior finishing work ahead of outside structural work, allowing numerous teams to work simultaneously and expedite project completion. |
Crashing a software development project could mean investing in specialized software tools to speed up testing procedures or employing more developers to focus on coding duties. |
What is Fast Tracking in Project Management?
Within project management, the potential to quicken cut-off dates and timetables without sacrificing first-class is regularly an especially sought-after competence. By overlapping duties that would commonly manifest one after the other, fast-tracking gives challenge managers a way to shorten timelines and end projects more quickly. This article will cover the simple ideas at the back of fast-tracking, in addition to its goals, crucial tactics, and possible benefits and downsides of placing it into practice.
Table of Content
- What is fast-tracking in Project Management?
- Key Concepts and Principles
- Fast Tracking Techniques and Strategies
- Benefits of Fast Tracking
- Risks of Fast Tracking
- Implementation Considerations
- Difference between Fast Tracking and Crashing
- Case Studies and Examples
- Conclusion