Disadvantages of Planning Poker
- Opposition to Change: Teams who are not experienced with Agile approaches or estimate techniques may experience resistance or suspicion when introducing Planning Poker. Facilitators may need to invest in training, knowledge, and patience to overcome resistance and guarantee buy-in from team members.
- Dependency on Team Dynamics: Good teamwork and communication are critical components of planning poker. Estimates may not be as accurate if team members are not involved or if they are impacted by biases like groupthink or anchoring.
- Uncertainty in Estimates: Planning Poker can not promise exact or accurate estimates, but it does attempt to provide relative estimates of effort or complexity.
Wideband Delphi and Planning Poker
Wideband Delphi and Planning Poker are two well-known methods used in decision-making and project estimates. Planning Poker is a cooperative technique used in agile approaches to estimate the effort required for accomplishing projects, whereas Wideband Delphi concentrates on obtaining expert viewpoints and encouraging agreement through iterative rounds of feedback. Both approaches provide organized frameworks to improve project planning accuracy and dependability, guaranteeing effective resource allocation and excellent project outcomes.
Table of Content
- What is Wideband Delphi?
- Advantages of Wideband Delphi
- Disadvantages of Wideband Delphi
- What is Planning Poker
- Advantages of Planning Poker
- Disadvantages of Planning Poker
- Difference between Wideband Delphi and Planning Poker
- Future Trends and Innovations in Wideband Delphi and Planning Poker
- Conclusion