Disadvantages of Requirements Validation Techniques
- Increased time and cost: Using validation techniques can be time-consuming and costly, especially when involving multiple stakeholders.
- Risk of conflicting requirements: Using validation techniques can lead to conflicting requirements, which can make it difficult to prioritize and implement the requirements.
- Risk of changing requirements: Requirements may change over time and it can be difficult to keep up with the changes and ensure that the project is aligned with the updated requirements.
- Misinterpretation and miscommunication: Misinterpretation and miscommunication can occur when trying to understand the requirements.
- Dependence on the tool: The team should be well-trained on the tool and its features to avoid dependency on the tool and not on the requirement.
- Limited validation: The validation techniques can only check the requirement that is captured and may not identify the requirement that is missed
- Limited to functional requirements: Some validation techniques are limited to functional requirements and may not validate non-functional requirements.
Requirements Validation Techniques – Software Engineering
Requirements Validation Techniques are used to ensure that the software requirements are complete, consistent, and correct. This article focuses on discussing the Requirements Validation Technique in detail.