Failures of Surat Split
There are some Failures of the Surat Split. These are:
- The most evident failure was the split itself, leading to a formal division within the Indian National Congress. This division occurred along ideological lines, primarily between the extremists and the moderates within the party.
- The internal strife within the Congress was advantageous for the British colonial rulers. The division weakened the unified opposition that the Congress could have presented against British colonial policies.
- The split damaged the credibility of the Indian National Congress as a reliable and united political force. The public image of the Congress as the representative of Indian aspirations suffered due to internal conflicts.
- The split led to a significant shift in the leadership of the Congress. The moderates, who were more accommodating in their approach, retained control, while the more assertive extremists found themselves marginalized within the party.
Surat Split
Surat Split: The Congress split at Surat came in December 1907, around the time when revolutionary activity had gained momentum. Congress split into moderates and extremists in the Surat Session in 1907. The split was caused by ideological differences between them. The Moderates advocated for moderate methods of constitutional agitation. Extremists promoted aggressive tactics like swadeshi and boycotts.
In this article, we will delve into the Surat Split of Congress, its history, causes, impact, key points, and failures, along with the difference between moderates and extremists.
Table of Content
- What was Surat Split?
- Historical Background of Surat Split
- Causes of the Surat Split
- Consequences of the Surat Split
- Impact of Surat Split
- Ideological Difference Between Moderates and Extremists
- Key Points on Surat Split
- Failures of Surat Split
- Surat Split and the Lucknow Session 1916