Spring MVC vs WebFlux
Q-1. What is the main purpose of Spring MVC?
If someone is looking to build web applications that stick to the (MVC)Model-View-Controller pattern, Spring MVC is the way to go. It’s perfect for creating both traditional and synchronous web applications and services.
Q-2. Does Spring MVC have the capability to handle asynchronous requests?
Spring MVC is mainly built for synchronous processing, but it does have the ability to handle asynchronous request processing. However, it’s very important to keep in mind that it may not be as efficient as a fully reactive stack like Spring WebFlux.
Q-3. Does Spring WebFlux are more challenging than Spring MVC?
Spring WebFlux, things can get a little more complicated than usual. because it utilizes the reactive programming paradigm, which requires a distinct way of thinking compared to traditional synchronous processing.
Q-4. Can WebSocket be supported by both Spring MVC and Spring WebFlux?
WebSocket is supported by both Spring MVC and Spring WebFlux, enabling bidirectional communication over a single TCP connection. However, Spring WebFlux takes a more up-to-date approach by incorporating a reactive model.
Difference Between Spring MVC and Spring WebFlux
Spring MVC
Spring MVC Framework takes on the Model-View-Controller design pattern, which moves around the Dispatcher Servlet, also called the Front Controller. With the help of annotations like @Controller and @RequestMapping, the by-default handler becomes a robust(strong) tool with a diverse set of handling ways. This kind of dynamic kind of feature allows for easy customization and efficient handling in multiple cases.
In Spring 3.0, the @Controller annotation has a feature that not only allows developers to make regular websites and apps but also certifies them to build RESTful ones as well. By using the @PathVariable annotation and other features, building RESTful websites and applications becomes very easy.
Spring WebFlux
Spring Framework was introduced along with Spring Web MVC, a Web framework that was designed for Servlet API and Servlet containers. But then, as version 5.0 was introduced, Spring surprised things up by presenting Spring WebFlux. This framework takes a different path to building web development, focusing on a reactive-stack design.
Inside Spring Framework, we’ll find couple of web frameworks called spring-webmvc and spring-webflux. It’s interesting that these two frameworks have names that are similar to their original modules. What’s even more interesting thing is that these two frameworks can operate together peacefully.
We are free to choose whether we want to use one or both frameworks. So, if it aligns with what we’re looking for, we can combine Spring MVC controllers with the reactive WebClient.
In this article, we will be learning Spring MVC vs Spring WebFlux.