GoogleNet

GoogleNet is also known as (Inception v1), it was developed by a team at Google led by Christian Szegedy. It won the ILSVRC in 2014 and introduced several innovative concepts that aimed to address the challenges faced by deep neural networks.

Inception Modules: GoogleNet utilizes inception modules which use a deep, multi-branch architecture. It is composed of multiple parallel convolutional layers with different filter sizes. This allows the model to capture features at various scales and resolutions simultaneously.

  • Dimensionality Reduction: To reduce computational complexity and improve efficiency, GoogleNet employs 1×1 convolutional layers for dimensionality reduction before applying larger convolutions. This helps to preserve important spatial information while reducing the number of parameters.
  • Auxiliary Classifiers: GoogleNet uses auxiliary classifiers at intermediate layers during training to combat the vanishing gradient problem and provide additional regularization.

The key features of GoogleNet are as follows:

  • GoogleNet tried to overcome deep CNNs’ computational inefficiencies. It uses the Inception module which reduces the number of parameters in the network and boosts computing efficiency. It outperformed AlexNet in terms of accuracy while using fewer parameters compared to AlexNet.
  • GoogleNet is a considerably deeper network with 22 levels. Its depth enables it to collect more intricate characteristics and patterns from images, allowing it to perform better on larger and more complicated datasets.
  • In 2014, GoogleNet won the ILSVRC, beating AlexNet. It demonstrated the efficiency of its Inception module by achieving improved accuracy while utilising fewer parameters.

In the context of image recognition, GoogleNet excels at capturing both fine-grained details and high-level features. For instance, when identifying objects within an image, GoogleNet’s inception modules can simultaneously detect small-scale details. Details like facial features and larger-scale patterns like object shapes and textures.

Differences between AlexNet and GoogleNet:

Features

AlexNet

GoogleNet

Architecture

Deep (8 layers)

Deep (22 layers)

Activation Function

ReLU

ReLU

Pooling

Overlapping

Non-overlapping

Convolution

Consecutive

Parallel (inception)

Dimensionality

No reduction

1×1 Convolution

Regularization

Dropout

Auxiliary Classifiers

Conclusion:

From the above information, GoogleNet is a more complex and powerful architecture than AlexNet. It achieves better performance on image classification tasks, but it is also more computationally expensive to train. Overall, GoogleNet is a more robust and efficient CNN architecture than AlexNet. However, AlexNet is still a valuable architecture that can be used for image classification tasks.



Difference between AlexNet and GoogleNet

Convolutional Neural Networks are a type of deep learning algorithm that is mainly used for image classification tasks. They are capable of learning hierarchical features from the images, which allows them to achieve high accuracy on various types of datasets.

The two most well-known Convolutional Neural Networks architectures are AlexNet and GoogleNet. AlexNet was first introduced in 2012. It was a breakthrough architecture that significantly improved the state-of-the-art for image classification. GoogleNet was introduced in 2014. It built on the success of AlexNet by introducing a number of new innovations.

In this article, we will compare AlexNet and GoogleNet and discuss the differences between these two architectures.

Similar Reads

AlexNet:

AlexNet, developed by Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Geoffrey Hinton, is a landmark model that won the ImageNet Large-Scale Visual Recognition Challenge (ILSVRC) in 2012. It introduced several innovative ideas that shaped the future of CNNs....

GoogleNet

GoogleNet is also known as (Inception v1), it was developed by a team at Google led by Christian Szegedy. It won the ILSVRC in 2014 and introduced several innovative concepts that aimed to address the challenges faced by deep neural networks....