Key Concepts under Competition Act, 2002

1. Anti-Competitive Agreements: Anti-competitive agreements, as defined in Section 2(b) of the act, encompass arrangements between business parties that have the potential to undermine fair competition or show undue favoritism. These agreements, whether written or informal, fall within the broad scope outlined by Section 3 of the act, prohibiting arrangements that significantly reduce competition within India. Notably, the act considers cartels, often characterized by secrecy, as one form of anti-competitive agreement. If any agreement violates section 3 of the Competition Act 2002, it is deemed void.

2. Abuse of Dominant Position: The act addresses the abuse of dominant positions by entities or individuals that can exploit their strong market position to the detriment of fair competition. Dominant positions are determined based on a firm’s impact on the relevant market. Section 4 of the act specifies instances constituting an abuse of dominant position, such as unfair pricing practices, limiting production, hindering market access, or leveraging dominance in one market to influence another. Unlike offenses related to anti-competitive agreements and combinations, the offense of “abuse of dominant position” doesn’t hinge on establishing an appreciable adverse effect on competition.

3. Regulation of Combinations: The act regulates three types of combinations: acquisition of stock or assets, gaining control over an enterprise, and mergers. To prevent undue concentration of economic power, Section 5 of the Competition Act, 2002 sets specific thresholds for scrutiny. Certain agreements with governmental financial institutions are exempted to accommodate strategic financial arrangements. Section 6 of the Competition Act, 2002 outlines the notification process, requiring entities to inform the Competition Commission of India (CCI) within 30 days of execution of the acquisition instrument or board approval for mergers. The combination comes into effect 210 days after notice or the date of the CCI’s order, whichever is earlier.

4. Limitations under Section 5: Section 5 of the Competition Act, 2002 imposes limitations on combinations based on assets and turnover to ensure that larger combinations undergo scrutiny, preventing adverse effects on competition in the Indian market. For acquisitions, both the acquiring and target entities must meet specific criteria, including asset and turnover thresholds. In the case of mergers or amalgamations, the resulting entity must satisfy prescribed thresholds for assets and turnover. These limitations are designed to strike a balance, allowing smaller combinations that may not significantly harm competition while subjecting larger combinations to thorough evaluation.

Competition Act, 2002: Meaning, Objectives, Features and Regulatory Framework

Similar Reads

What is Competition Act, 2002 ?

Competition Act, 2002 stands as a crucial legislative framework governing commercial competition in India, replacing the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices (MRTP) Act of 1969. Enacted with the primary objective of preventing activities that could adversely impact competition within the country, the act addresses concerns related to the concentration of wealth and the prevention of monopolistic practices. To ensure compliance, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) and the Competition Appellate Tribunal (CAT) have been established. The overarching goal of the act is to promote healthy competition, safeguard consumer interests, and prevent practices that could hinder a competitive market environment. Through provisions that regulate combinations and empower the CCI, the act aims to strike a balance between fostering competition and ensuring consumer welfare....

Objectives of the Competition Act, 2002

The Competition Act, 2002 serves as pivotal legislation with the overarching goal of safeguarding consumer interests, fostering and sustaining healthy market competition, protecting consumer rights, and ensuring the freedom of trade for all market participants. This comprehensive law replaces the earlier MRTP Act, which was confined to India and primarily addressed monopolies and restrictive trade practices. The framework of the Competition Act rests on three key components: the Competition Commission of India (CCI), the Competition Appellate Tribunal (CAT), and the National Competition Policy (NCP). By employing these components, the act aims to guarantee that market competition operates as intended, promoting a diverse array of goods at fair prices and reinforcing consumer access to a broad spectrum of choices. This legislation reflects a contemporary approach to addressing the dynamics of competition and trade, ensuring a fair and competitive market environment....

Features of the Competition Act, 2002

1. Prohibition of Anti-Competitive Agreements: The Act’s strict prohibition of anti-competitive agreements serves as a linchpin in preserving fair competition. By explicitly preventing collaborations between enterprises that may adversely impact competition, it establishes a foundation for fostering a marketplace where fair play and innovation thrive. This provision encourages businesses to compete on merit, ensuring consumers have access to diverse and competitive choices....

Key Concepts under Competition Act, 2002

1. Anti-Competitive Agreements: Anti-competitive agreements, as defined in Section 2(b) of the act, encompass arrangements between business parties that have the potential to undermine fair competition or show undue favoritism. These agreements, whether written or informal, fall within the broad scope outlined by Section 3 of the act, prohibiting arrangements that significantly reduce competition within India. Notably, the act considers cartels, often characterized by secrecy, as one form of anti-competitive agreement. If any agreement violates section 3 of the Competition Act 2002, it is deemed void....

Regulatory Framework under Competition Act, 2002

The Competition Commission of India (CCI) founded on October 14, 2003 was enacted essentially. However, the government was unable to fully implement the act’s provisions since a writ petition was filed against some of them before the Honourable Supreme Court. When deciding the writ petition on January 20, 2005, the court mentioned that if the union government were to establish an expert body, it would be appropriate to consider the formation of two distinct bodies, one with expertise for advisory and regulatory functions and the other one for adjudicatory functions based on the constitutionally recognized doctrine of separation of powers. The CCI consists of a chairperson and six members that are appointed by the central government....

Conclusion

The Competition Act, 2002 serves as a comprehensive and pivotal legislative framework in India, replacing the earlier MRTP Act, with the primary goal of fostering fair competition, safeguarding consumer interests, and preventing anti-competitive practices. The act addresses a spectrum of concerns, including anti-competitive agreements, abuse of dominant positions, and the regulation of combinations. The establishment of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) and the Competition Appellate Tribunal (CAT) strengthens the regulatory framework, ensuring effective enforcement. The act’s features, such as the prohibition of anti-competitive agreements, regulation of combinations, and explicit consideration of consumer welfare, reflect its commitment to creating a competitive market environment. The CCI’s powers, duties, investigative processes, and international cooperation further contribute to the act’s robust implementation. Overall, the Competition Act, 2002 plays a crucial role in shaping and preserving a fair and competitive economic landscape in India....

Competition Act, 2002- FAQs

What’s the competition law in India’s concept?...