Misinterpretation of Globalization as Colonialism
It was then that most developing countries suffered economic stagnation and political oppression Self-sufficiency and centralisation did not produce prosperous, united countries. Instead, they produced more than 100 weak,22 misgoverned countries which, by the 1990s, needed to be rescued by the IMF The collapse of the Soviet Union and the rise of Deng in China showed that mere Socialism was not the solution so developing countries began moving in a new direction, globalisation. Why did the post-independence leaders in developing countries go so badly wrong? Mainly because they equated globalisation with 19th-century colonialism. They failed to see that in the late 20th century, globalisation was not a political conquest but an economic partnership, creating unprecedented opportunities for the poor to rise. This faulty interpretation led to faulty policies aimed at de-globalisation.
Essay on Globalisation and Development for Students
To take the treatment of development and globalization, it is first maintained that development which, in its initial stages in the 1950s was very much a part of the modernisation discourse, has entered a post-modernist stage. At the end of the Second World War, when several former colonies emerged as independent countries with membership in the United Nations, it was felt that something should be done for the development of these nations.