Morley-Minto Reforms Criticism
- The Congress leaders expressed dissatisfaction with the Morley-Minto reforms as they called for a responsible government, while the reforms primarily aimed at enhancing native participation in legislatures.
- The primary flaw in the reform was the implementation of separate electorates for Muslims. This led to a breakdown in Hindu-Muslim unity and played a crucial role in laying the groundwork for the country’s partition.
- Muslims were granted a separate electorate, coupled with a disproportionate reservation of a significant number of seats compared to their population.
- Indian nationalists considered it the British policy of ‘divide and rule’. The British aimed to divide the Nationalist ranks and turn moderates and Muslims against the nationalism tide.
Morley-Minto Reforms : Indian Councils Act of 1909
Morley-Minto Reforms: The Morley-Minto reforms, also known as the Indian Councils Act of 1909, were named after the Secretary of State for Indian Affairs, Lord John Morley, and the Viceroy, Lord Minto. This legislative initiative marked a significant departure by introducing the electoral method. The objective was to broaden the scope of legislative councils, address the demands of moderates within the Indian National Congress, and enhance Indian participation in governance. The Act represented amendments to the Indian Councils Acts of 1861 and 1892. Read below to learn about the Morley-Minto Reforms: Indian Councils Act of 1909 in depth.
Table of Content
- Background of the Morley-Minto Reforms:
- Features of the Morley-Minto reforms:
- Morley: Minto Reforms: Criticism:
- Importance of Morley-Minto Reforms: