Pros And Cons Of AWS SQS
Pros Of AWS SQS
- Suitable for situations in which various components of a system must function separately (such as load balancing and task offloading).
- Supports a pull mechanism so users can get messages whenever it’s convenient for them.
- Message persistence is offered until it is explicitly removed or fully processed.
Cons Of AWS SQS
- If a message delivery attempt is unsuccessful, consumers are in responsible for handling retries.
- AWS SQS has limit on Message size, Its maximum limit is 256KB per message which is challenging when dealing with larger payloads.
- SQS follows FIFO (Frist-In-First-Out) option, ensuring strict message ordering which increase the complexity and impact on overall system performance.
Amazon SNS VS SQS
When it comes to developing software, Amazon Web Services (AWS) corresponds to a developer’s dream toolkit. It assists in the development of dependable, high-performing apps that can manage heavy workloads. Amazon Simple Notification Service (SNS) and Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS) are two of the many services that AWS provides. These tools, which operate similarly to communication wizards, assist communication between various app components. Consider SNS as an instant messenger that can send messages to multiple recipients at once. However, SQS acts as a careful messenger, ensuring that messages are delivered in a well-organized manner even during congested times.
Table of Content
- What is AWS SNS(Simple Notification Service)?
- What is AWS SQS(Simple Queue Service)?
- Difference Between AWS SNS Vs AWS SQS
- What are the differences Between Amazon SQS, Amazon MQ and Amazon SNS?
- What are the difference between SNS and Kafka?
- When to Use Amazon SNS?
- When to Use Amazon SQS?
- When to Use Amazon SNS and Amazon SQS Together?
- How To Choose Between AWS SNS And AWS SQS?
- Pros And Cons Of AWS SNS
- Pros And Cons Of AWS SQS
- Use Cases of Amazon SNS and Amazon SQS
- Conclusion
- Amazon SNS And SQS – FAQs