Ultimate Resolution to Illbert Bill Conflict
- Viceroy Ripon was compelled to make amendments to the Illbert Bill due the heavy controversy.
- The revised bill no longer solely empowered Indian judges to preside over cases involving Europeans.
- Instead, it allowed both Indian and European judges to handle such cases, However, regardless of the judge’s identity, a European stood trial at least half of the jury members had to be European, it was a compromise that reflected the prevailing sentiments.
- This amended version of the bill was passed on January 25th, 1884, and became effective on May 1st of that year and it brought an end to the Illbert Bill controversy.
- However, this resolution deepened the divide between the British and Indian communities.
- The compromise further illustrated the racial biases prevalent in British India and aggravate tensions between the two groups.
Ilbert Bill: Meaning and Controversy
Ilbert Bill: The Ilbert Bill (1883) aimed to end racial restrictions on Indian magistrates trying European British subjects in British India, but due to strong opposition, it was amended to maintain racial distinctions in the jurisdiction.
In this article, We have discussed the What is Ilbert Bill in Detail.
Let’s dive right in.