What are “Deceptive Patterns”?

In UX design, deceptive patterns are methods or approaches used by designers to influence user behaviour in ways that might not be morally or transparently justified. These patterns frequently seek to influence particular behaviours or results that are advantageous to the organisation or designer, sometimes at the expense of the intents or best interests of the user.

1. Dark Patterns

A group of intentional design strategies known as “dark patterns” are used to sway users’ behaviour in ways that might not be in their best interests. These patterns frequently take advantage of psychological concepts to trick people into doing something they may not have wanted to do or did not fully understand.

Examples:

• Misleading Interfaces: This involves designing user interfaces in a way that leads users to make unintended choices. For instance, a website might use a visually prominent “Download” button that actually leads users to subscribe to a paid service.
• Unexpected Expenses: Another typical dark pattern is holding off on charging more until the user commits to a transaction. For instance, when a customer checks out on some e-commerce platforms, they could be charged unanticipated shipping costs.

Impact on Users:

Users may become dissatisfied, trust may be lost, and a brand’s image may be harmed by dark patterns. It is less likely for people to interact with a platform or make more purchases when they feel tricked or controlled. Dark patterns can also have ethical ramifications because they put immediate profits ahead of building lasting relationships with users.

Handling Dark Patterns:

• Clarity and Transparency: Designers should put transparency first when creating their designs, making it obvious what will happen if users do certain actions.
• Choices for Opting Out: Give consumers simple ways to choose not to participate in unwanted activities.

Also Read – Design Patterns for enhancing User Experience

2. False bottom

The intentional design technique known as “false bottom” involves drawing a visual border around a webpage to hide material that is displayed below the fold. This visual border encourages visitors to scroll down to find additional material by creating the illusion that the webpage terminates where the fake bottom is positioned.

Example:

• Faux Borders: To provide the impression that the information terminates at a certain point, designers can employ subtly coloured lines, gradients, or shadows. Users are tricked into thinking they have reached the bottom of the page by this fake border.
• Invisible Barriers: Some websites hide material below the fold using translucent items or white space, creating the illusion that there is nothing more to see.

Impact on Users:

Users who anticipate seeing more content below the fold may become frustrated and confused as a result of false bottoms. Consumers may believe that the website or brand is fraudulent or misleading, which would damage their opinion of it. False bottom can also degrade user experience by making it more difficult for users to locate essential information.

Handling False Bottom:

• Consistent Design Language: To prevent misleading visual boundaries, keep the webpage’s design elements consistent. Make sure the design does not obstruct vital information and appropriately reflects the content’s structure.
• Transparent Navigation: To make it easier for visitors to traverse a webpage effectively, give them options for simple navigation, including a visible scrollbar or menu. Users are empowered to explore the information without feeling mislead by clear navigation hints.

3. Misdirection

When design aspects or features on a website or application divert people from their intended path or purpose, it’s known as misdirection. Users are misled by deceptive indications or distractions and end up losing focus on crucial content or tasks.

Examples:

• Imitating System Alerts: A few websites or programmes use pop-up advertisements or notifications that appear to be error messages or system alerts.
• Hidden Navigation: Concealing navigation options or essential functionalities within the interface can also be a form of misdirection. Users may struggle to find the desired actions or content, resulting in frustration and confusion.

Impact on Users:

By causing misunderstanding, annoyance, and mistrust, misdirection erodes the user experience. User confidence in the platform or brand may be damaged when users come across misleading design elements that mislead them, causing them to give up on planned tasks or interactions.

Managing Misdirection:

• Clarity and uniformity: To reduce the possibility of misdirection, designers should give priority to clarity and uniformity in their designs. Elucidate the function and goal of design elements in a clear and concise manner to prevent confusion or ambiguity.
• User-Centric Design: Prioritise the requirements and expectations of the end user throughout the whole design process. Consider the objectives and actions of the user, and make sure that the design supports their path without adding needless obstacles or detours.

4. Disguised Ads

Advertisements that are hidden to look like other kinds of information, such news stories, user-generated content, or authentic website elements, are known as disguised ads. These advertisements are meant to look more natural and less obtrusive to viewers by blending in with the surrounding material.

Examples:

• Native Advertising: Advertisements seamlessly integrated into the website’s content, mimicking the style and format of editorial content. Users may mistake these ads for genuine articles or recommendations.
• Promoted Posts: It can be difficult to discern between sponsored and user-generated material on social media platforms since they frequently appear alongside organic content in users’ feeds.

Impact on Users:

Users may become confused by disguised advertisements and lose faith in the website or platform. Users may unintentionally click on advertisements and make purchases if they are unable to distinguish between sponsored and organic content. Additionally, hidden advertisements have the potential to reduce user engagement on the site and damage the credibility of the content.

Managing Disguised Ads:

• Clear Differentiation: Clearly marking advertisements as “Sponsored” or “Promoted” helps users identify them as paid content.
• Consistent Design Language: Maintain consistency in design elements across the platform to ensure that sponsored content stands out without disrupting the overall user experience.

5. Hidden Subscription

The practice of “hidden subscription” is hiding subscription information or posing challenges to users who want to stop receiving automatic payments. This strategy makes it difficult for users to manage their subscriptions or cancel in an effort to keep them and increase income.

Examples:

• Buried Cancellation Options: Some subscription services purposefully hide the cancellation option from users by hiding it behind confusing menus or several levels of navigation.
• Confusing wording: To mislead customers or dissuade them from cancelling, subscription services sometimes employ unclear or complicated wording in their cancellation procedures. This can involve ambiguous terms and conditions or deceptive cues.

Impact on Users:

Those who feel ensnared in undesired memberships may get frustrated and mistrustful as a result of Hidden Subscription. Consumers may find it difficult to handle their money or feel duped by the lack of openness, which could damage their opinion of the brand or service.

Managing Hidden Subscription:

• Clear Communication: It is the responsibility of designers to make sure that users are informed up front about all subscription terms, including cost, frequency of renewal, and cancellation procedures.
• Easy Cancellation: Make sure users have simple ways to end their subscriptions. For example, give them a visible “Cancel Subscription” button in their account settings.

6. Confirmshaming

A deceptive technique used in user interfaces to make people feel guilty or ashamed into performing a specific action. Users are frequently forced to give personal information, subscribe to newsletters, or make purchases against their better judgement using this tactic.

Example:

Confirmshaming would be the wording and layout of online prompts and pop-ups. Users may be presented with a choice that is actually a guilt-inducing statement by the UI, rather than a clear way to deny an offer or request. An example of a prompt could be, “No, I don’t want to save money,” as opposed to a polite and straightforward “No thanks.”

Impact on Users:

Confirmshaming can evoke negative emotions and undermine the user experience by making users feel manipulated or pressured. Users may feel uncomfortable or annoyed when faced with guilt-inducing language, leading to a decline in trust and engagement with the website or brand.

Managing Confirmshaming:

• Clearly Presented Options: Designers work to give consumers the opportunity to politely and clearly reject offers or requests without using coercive methods.
• Transparent Communication: Clearly and openly convey the effects of users’ actions. Make sure users are free to make educated judgements without feeling pressured and that they are aware of the consequences of their actions

7. Roach Motel

When consumers can easily enter a scenario or commit to something, but it becomes difficult for them to leave or cancel it. The term “roach motel” comes from the pest control business, where roaches are able to enter but are unable to exit. This pattern, as it relates to UX design, usually entails erecting obstacles to departure or cancellation, purposefully making it difficult for consumers to withdraw from a service or commitment.

Example:

Subscription services are a typical setting for the Roach Motel pattern. With a few clicks, users may sign up for a subscription online, but when they choose to cancel, they find that the procedure necessitates contacting customer support by phone or a drawn-out email exchange. This is in stark contrast to how simple it is to sign up, which irritates people who want to stop using the service.

Impact on Users:

Users may experience irritation, powerlessness, and mistrust as a result of the Roach Motel pattern. Users may see the service provider as manipulative or dishonest if they encounter needless obstacles to leaving or cancelling. The user-provider connection may suffer as a result of this unpleasant experience, and users may be deterred from using the service in the future.

Managing Roach Motel:

• Streamlined Exit Procedures: It should be a top priority for designers to provide easy-to-use ways for customers to terminate or cancel services.
• Transparent Communication: Users should be made aware of the cancellation procedure as well as any related terms and conditions up front.

Also Read

• Qualities of Good User Interface
• How Page Speed Impacts User Experience ?
• What is the Importance of User Flows in UX ?

In the dynamic field of User Experience (UX) design, designing intuitive, fluid interfaces is critical. But in the process of trying to make users happy and engaged, some dishonest tendencies have surfaced, gently swaying user behaviour in directions that might not always be in their best interests. They can take many different forms, such as deceptive designs that mask genuine intents or dark patterns that steer people toward inadvertent acts.

We explore the field of UX design in this investigation to identify the top 10 dishonest tendencies that designers need to be aware of. More significantly, we’ll explore methods for efficiently controlling and reducing these trends, guaranteeing that user experiences continue to be open, truthful, and ultimately advantageous. By understanding these deceptive practices and learning how to navigate them, designers can uphold ethical standards while crafting interfaces that prioritize user empowerment and satisfaction.