Comparison between Wayland and X11
Criteria |
Wayland |
X11 |
---|---|---|
Performance |
Wayland offers improved performance with smoother animations and reduced latency. |
X11 may experience performance bottlenecks due to its complex architecture. |
Security |
Wayland provides enhanced security by isolating applications, preventing one misbehaving application from affecting others or the system. |
X11’s security model is less robust, with potential vulnerabilities due to its design. |
Ease of Development |
Developing applications for Wayland is generally simpler due to its modern protocol and architecture. |
Developing applications for X11 can be more complex and cumbersome |
Hardware Support |
Wayland is well-suited for modern graphics hardware, ensuring compatibility and optimal performance. |
X11 may have compatibility issues with newer hardware and technologies. |
Adoption and Compatibility |
Wayland adoption may face challenges due to the need to rewrite or adapt existing software. Compatibility with older applications may vary. |
X11 has been widely adopted for decades, with extensive compatibility and support for legacy applications. |
Wayland in linux development & programming
Wayland is a fresh way of dealing with graphics on Linux computers. It’s a new platform, designed to replace the old methods of handling how things look and work on your screen. In this exploration of Wayland, we’ll take a closer look at its origins, how it’s structured, what benefits it brings, and the challenges it faces.