Aftermath of Jallianwala Bagh Massacre
Many moderates of the country turned to be nationalists following the incident, abandoning their loyalty to the British. Major General William Beynon came to respond to Colonel Dyer’s Report to his superiors that he was “confronted by a revolutionary army” by saying that ” Your action was proper and Lieutenant Governor agrees”. Viceroy Lord Chemford had agreed to O’ Dwyer for the imposition of martial law in Amritsar and other locations.
Government buildings were burned down and many strikes and chases against the police followed. In retaliation, authorities have terrorized and also humiliated the people. Villages around Gujranwala in Punjab came to be blasted and the satyagrahis were forced to bow to senior officials by touching their noses to the ground.
Related Links
Rowlatt Act and Jallianwala Bagh Massacre (1919)
Rowlatt Act: The Rowlatt Act was passed by the British government to increase its power and grip over the local public. The law was passed in March 1919 by the Imperial Legislative Council, which gave them the power to arrest any person without the need for trial. For abolishment of such a cruel act, Gandhi and some other leaders called for a Hartal or suspension of work, in order to show the objections of Indians to the rule, which was known as Rowlatt Satyagraha.
Jallianwala Bagh Massacre: The Jallianwala Bagh Massacre took place when several villagers gathered in the park for the celebration of Baisakhi. The gatherers wanted to peacefully protest against the arrest and deportation of two national leaders, namely Satyapal and Saifuddin Kitchlew.
Table of Content
- Facts About Rowlatt Act
- What is the Rowlatt Act?
- Jallianwala Bagh Massacre Incident
- Causes of the Jallianwala Bagh Massacre
- Effects of the Jallianwala Bagh Massacre
- Events Leading Up to the Massacre
- Aftermath of Jallianwala Bagh Massacre