Aftermath of Jallianwala Bagh Massacre

Many moderates of the country turned to be nationalists following the incident, abandoning their loyalty to the British. Major General William Beynon came to respond to Colonel Dyer’s Report to his superiors that he was “confronted by a revolutionary army” by saying that ” Your action was proper and Lieutenant Governor agrees”. Viceroy Lord Chemford had agreed to O’ Dwyer for the imposition of martial law in Amritsar and other locations.

Government buildings were burned down and many strikes and chases against the police followed. In retaliation, authorities have terrorized and also humiliated the people. Villages around Gujranwala in Punjab came to be blasted and the satyagrahis were forced to bow to senior officials by touching their noses to the ground.

Related Links

Rowlatt Act and Jallianwala Bagh Massacre (1919)

Rowlatt Act: The Rowlatt Act was passed by the British government to increase its power and grip over the local public. The law was passed in March 1919 by the Imperial Legislative Council, which gave them the power to arrest any person without the need for trial. For abolishment of such a cruel act, Gandhi and some other leaders called for a Hartal or suspension of work, in order to show the objections of Indians to the rule, which was known as Rowlatt Satyagraha.

Jallianwala Bagh Massacre: The Jallianwala Bagh Massacre took place when several villagers gathered in the park for the celebration of Baisakhi. The gatherers wanted to peacefully protest against the arrest and deportation of two national leaders, namely Satyapal and Saifuddin Kitchlew.

Jallianwala Bagh Massacre

Table of Content

  • Facts About Rowlatt Act
  • What is the Rowlatt Act?
  • Jallianwala Bagh Massacre Incident
  • Causes of the Jallianwala Bagh Massacre
  • Effects of the Jallianwala Bagh Massacre
  • Events Leading Up to the Massacre
  • Aftermath of Jallianwala Bagh Massacre

Similar Reads

Rowlatt Act, 1919

...

Overview of Rowlatt Act and Jallianwala Bagh Massacre

Some important features and characteristics of Rowlatt Act, 1919 are as follows:...

Facts About Rowlatt Act

Rowlatt Act...

What is the Rowlatt Act?

Meaning of Rowlatt Act Rowlatt Act was passed by Rowlatt Committee, presided by Sir Sydney Rowlatt. The Act authorised the arrest, for 2 years without scope of trial, for any person who would be suspected for terrorism in British India. Black bills association with Rowlatt Act Central legislature had introduced two bills which authorised police for searching a place without any search warrant and arrest anyone. These bills were known to be Black Bills. Who resigned from Imperial Legislative Council after Rowlatt Act was passed? 3 personalities: Madan Mohan Malviya Muhammad Ali Jinnah Mazhar ul Haq When was Rowlatt Satyagraha initiated? 6th April 1919 Which Congress leaders were arrested? Dr. Satyapal and Saifuddin Kitchlew....

Jallianwala Bagh Massacre Incident

Rowlatt Act was officially known as Anarchical and Revolutionary Crimes Act, 1919 and was passed by Imperial Legislative Council. This act was authorised by government for detaining people suspected of terrorist activities without trial for up to 2 years. This empowered police for searching for a place without warrant and also placed severe restrictions on the freedom of press....

Causes of the Jallianwala Bagh Massacre

On the afternoon of April 13, a crowd of around 10,000 men, women, and children gathered in Jallianwala Bagh, which was enclosed by walls and had only one exit. It is uncertain how many people present there were protesting against the public gathering and how many celebrated Baisakhi, a spring festival. The single access to the park was guarded by a regiment of soldiers when General Dyer, a British military commander, proclaimed the assembly unlawful and abruptly ordered his troops to open fire. Ten minutes of continuous fire happened until all the ammunition was used. According to one official record, an estimated 379 people were killed and around 1,200 more were wounded. After the cease-fire, the troops immediately left the place, with people bleeding and dying....

Effects of the Jallianwala Bagh Massacre

The Jallianwala Bagh massacre occurred on April 13, 1919, in Amritsar, Punjab, India. The British government introduced the Rowlatt Act, which granted them the power to detain anyone accused of terrorist activities without a trial, to conduct location searches without a warrant, and restricted press freedom. Indians were outraged by this act, and the public and Indian politicians condemned it. Mahatma Gandhi led a protest called the Rowlatt Satyagraha, but it was marred by violence in various regions, especially in Punjab. The British government imposed martial law in Punjab, and on April 13, 1919, General Dyer arrived with his men and opened fire at a peaceful gathering in Jallianwala Bagh, killing many unarmed men, women, and children. This incident turned moderate Indians into nationalists, and many people went to the streets in various north Indian cities, burning down government buildings and striking against the police. In retaliation, the authorities terrorized and humiliated the people. Satyagrahis were forced to bow before senior officials by touching their noses to the ground....

Events Leading Up to the Massacre

The Jallianwala Bagh massacre was a tragic event in India in 1919. It was a result of a law passed by the British government that allowed them to arrest people without a trial. This caused widespread opposition, and protests broke out across the country. The British responded with violence, and the massacre at Jallianwala Bagh was a turning point in India’s fight for independence....

Aftermath of Jallianwala Bagh Massacre

Before the Jallianwala Bagh massacre, there were many protests and unrest in response to the Rowlatt Act passed by the British government in 1919. This act gave the British government the power to arrest and detain Indian citizens without trial, which led to a lot of opposition from the Indian people. To stop the protests, the British government declared martial law in Punjab and other places, causing even more violence and unrest. The people of India were very unhappy with British rule and protested in many different cities....

Frequently Asked Questions

Many moderates of the country turned to be nationalists following the incident, abandoning their loyalty to the British. Major General William Beynon came to respond to Colonel Dyer’s Report to his superiors that he was “confronted by a revolutionary army” by saying that ” Your action was proper and Lieutenant Governor agrees”. Viceroy Lord Chemford had agreed to O’ Dwyer for the imposition of martial law in Amritsar and other locations....